3. Site history

3.0    Site history


Poplar vestry was one of the first in London to implement the Baths and Wash-Houses Act 1846-47 which resulted in the present site in East India Dock Road being acquired in 1850 and two years later a modest building containing a bathing facility was opened to the public. Increased demand led to an extensive overhaul of the facilities and structure, first in the 1880s and again at the turn of the century. However, the building deteriorated, persuading the then London Borough of Poplar to build a larger structure on an expanded site.

The idea for a new baths building goes back to the mid 1920s, a period when a more leisure orientated concept of baths was becoming popular, as opposed to the previous 'sanitary' rationale. The existing contract drawings for the new baths are dated 1931 and following a brief delay attributable to the national financial crisis of 1931, the building was erected in 1932-4 to the designs of Horley Heckford, Borough Engineer, and RW Stanton, Chief Assistant.
Section through Poplar Baths
Section through Poplar Baths - click to enlarge

An article published in the Architect and Building news in 1934 stated that "Poplar Borough, Council may certainly, claim to possess one of the finest and best equipped baths of comparable purpose in the country" (January 19 1934, p 103).

The baths were noted for the innovative socio-economic ideals that fuelled its conception, i.e. creating local employment opportunities, whilst also promoting healthy living.

The front elevation is a monumental tripartite composition of three stepped brick masses, with stone plinth and cornice and stone surrounds to a steel centrepiece. The exterior architecture displays two distinct parts, namely the main swimming bath block on the east, and the section containing offices and the smaller swimming bath to the west. However the relationship between the two sections is considered to be poorly resolved.

The bathhouse comprised two swimming pools, positioned parallel to each other; one of 100 ft length, the other 65.5 ft length, with ample accommodation fitted around them. The bathhouse also included turkish baths in the basement, men's slipper baths on the first floor women's slipper baths on the second floor, a large boiler to the rear and the main pool had amphitheatre seating at the sides and a spectators' gallery. The spectators' gallery was positioned above the entrance, with a committee room above it with views over the main pool. These arrangements all essentially survive, however, the two swimming pools have now been filled with concrete.

The smaller pool is a simple toplit structure. The larger pool is much grander in design, with a high roof of stepped section with clerestory lights carried by a run of elliptical conecrete arches, creating the most imposing part of the building and was an innovative method for bringing natural light into the baths.

The elliptical arch marked an important and dramatic stage in the design of the British bathhouse, introducing an ambitious level of internal architecture, previously only applied to the entrance and front of a swimming pool complex, The style derives most directly from Easton and Robertson's Royal Horticultural Hall built in 1927-8, but with the one crucial difference being that the arches of Poplar Baths were not carried out in reinforced concrete, whereas the Royal Agricultural Hall was. The Royal Agricultural Hall, which is now listed grade II*, provided the model for many municipal baths in the late 1920s and 1930s.

The internal decorations, including mosaic floors, tile work, windows and other sundry features of the building were also noted for their consistency and charm.

The original design enabled the bath to be floored over in winter months to provide a flexible community space use for sporting matches, theatricals, public meetings and exhibitions. Closed after bomb damage during the second World War, the hall was reinstated in the 1950s. A wider range of sports facilities were installed during the 1960s, but these moved to other sites in the 1980s.

The number of people using the baths steadily declined over this period and in 1985 they were closed.

P O P L A R   B A T H S   P L A N N I N G   B R I E F   J A N U A R Y   2 0 0 3
Previous Next
  Introduction | Regeneration context | Site history | Planning policy context | Urban design analysis | Site constraints and opportunities | Planning and design principles